Home
/
Market insights
/
Market analysis
/

60 million millionaires vs. 21 million bitcoin: the inequality

60 Million Millionaires vs. 21 Million Bitcoin | The Value Proposition of Scarcity

By

Alice Chen

Jan 26, 2026, 07:13 AM

Edited By

Omar Ahmed

3 minutes to read

A visual representation showing 60 million millionaires on one side and 21 million Bitcoin on the other side, illustrating the wealth gap.
popular

A significant divide is emerging between the world’s growing number of millionaires and the finite supply of Bitcoin. With 60 million millionaires globally and only 21 million Bitcoin available, the question arises: How will this scarcity impact the digital currency's value in the future?

The Scarcity Argument

Bitcoin's limited supply is often hailed as a key factor driving demand. However, commentary surrounding this issue reveals mixed sentiments. One commenter pointed out, "If most Bitcoin is either lost or owned by a small percentage of people, why would its value skyrocket?" This skepticism indicates a broader concern about Bitcoin's desirability among the wealthy and its potential as a "base layer of wealth."

While supporters argue Bitcoin's infinite divisibility enhances its utility, detractors worry about inherent demand. A commenter summed it up, stating, "A majority of the people (99% maybe?) are not going to even care what is bitcoin."

What Makes Bitcoin Unique?

Bitcoin is not only scarce but also possesses unique properties that set it apart from other assets. According to one reply, "It cannot ever be debased or controlled by any one entity," and this may resonate with those seeking secure wealth preservation.

An intriguing point raised in discussions centers around the role of Bitcoin as a safe harbor during economic turmoil. One user remarked that the ongoing shift towards sound money, amplified by institutional interest, points to a bullish outlook for Bitcoin in the future.

Diverging Opinions

Despite the advocates, skepticism looms large. One member declared, "Not every millionaire even wants a BTC they’re already rich." This sentiment reflects a viewpoint that questions Bitcoin's appeal among established wealthy individuals who might prefer other assets.

"This sets dangerous precedent" - Top-voted comment highlights the caution some users feel towards Bitcoin's future.

Overall, discussions show a mix of enthusiasm about the future value of Bitcoin alongside caution rooted in wealth redistribution and demand concerns. Could shifting interests among the wealthy lead to greater adoption, or will doubts around Bitcoin's utility hinder its growth?

Key Observations

  • πŸ’° 60 million millionaires versus 21 million Bitcoin: The math highlights scarcity.

  • πŸ“‰ Diverse perspectives on demand: Many wonder if Bitcoin's limited supply translates to a premium price.

  • πŸ”’ Unique monetary characteristics: Bitcoin's decentralized nature drives interest in securing wealth.

The conversation continues as market dynamics evolve, but clarity on Bitcoin's ultimate utility and value remains elusive. Investors are left to ponder their strategies amid this growing divide.

Forecasting a Wealth Shift

There’s a strong chance that as inflation pressures mount and traditional investments falter, more millionaires will consider Bitcoin as part of their wealth strategy. Experts estimate that about 30% of high-net-worth individuals may invest in Bitcoin over the next few years, driven by its allure as a hedge against economic instability. Increased regulatory clarity and acceptance could further encourage this shift, potentially raising Bitcoin's value significantly. However, skepticism remains a component of market sentiment; if fear regarding ownership and utility persists, Bitcoin’s trajectory might stall.

A Historical Lens

An interesting parallel lies in the early days of fine art investmentβ€”when the affluent began shifting capital away from traditional assets into artworks in the late 20th century. Just as Bitcoin today, art was initially met with skepticism from conventional investors. Yet, over time, certain artists became prominent, and art as an asset class flourished, leading to wealth concentrated in select pieces. This evolution mirrors the situation with Bitcoin, suggesting that shifts toward unique assets can change market dynamics, with some investing to preserve wealth while others remain hesitant, fearing market saturation or lack of genuine value.