
The launch of Trezor 7 has ignited heated debate among people in the crypto community over its ability to shield Bitcoin from quantum computing threats. This controversy intensifies as users question its post-quantum cryptography and the urgency for the entire Bitcoin network to upgrade to combat these emerging risks.
Some commenters argue it might be premature to view quantum computing as an immediate danger. One noted, "Current Q computers aren't capable of cracking encryption. Major breakthroughs are needed for that to change." Others echoed skepticism about rushing to implement quantum-resistant algorithms, citing the potential computational load on the network. A participant added, "Quantum-resistant encryption tends to be way more computation-heavy, so we should do it when the quantum threat becomes real. "
While Trezor 7's specifications promise enhanced wallet security, many remain skeptical about its ability to protect the broader Bitcoin network. Users highlighted that sending Bitcoin exposes public keys, making them susceptible during the transaction confirmation stage. One individual warned, "When you send Bitcoin, you reveal the public key. During that time, a quantum computer can just RPF your BTC."
Interestingly, another commenter reassured that the current network is not inherently vulnerable. They pointed out, "There are already people working on upgrading and quantum-proofing Bitcoin," suggesting proactive efforts are underway to safeguard the network.
The issue of inactive wallets, with estimates ranging from 3 million to 5 million containing exposed public keys, raises additional alarms. If any of these wallets are compromised, it could lead to destabilizing Bitcoin's value. One user warned, "Imagine what happens if a country's 20% total wealth is stolen overnight."
Despite the concerns, many agree the Bitcoin network should swiftly adopt quantum-resistant algorithms that are compatible with Trezor 7's advancements. A voice in the discussion echoed this sentiment: "If BTC adopts some quantum-resistant algorithms that Trezor 7 supports, then I guess so."
Overall, opinions diverge within the community. While some express skepticism, others portray cautious optimism regarding the potential future upgrades. One respondent summarized the feelings of many when they asserted, "The real risk is legacy wallets. But I 100% agree the network will be upgraded. Too much money to be lost if it doesnβt happen."
"This quantum BS is going crazy. If quantum computers could crack crypto, all coins would collapse. Pointless to imagine that."
π Trezor 7 features post-quantum cryptography but might not fully protect against network-wide threats.
β οΈ Concerns linger over public key exposure during Bitcoin transactions, highlighting vulnerabilities.
π Inactive wallets represent a significant risk, potentially unlocking substantial dormant wealth.
π Many believe the network should upgrade urgently to mitigate future quantum threats
As quantum computing continues to advance, the crypto landscape faces daunting challenges. Will Trezor 7 be enough to keep Bitcoin secure, or will greater reforms be essential?