Edited By
Haruka Tanaka

A recent post from a local mayor has ignited a debate over the legitimacy of badge-related credits in the city. The mayor reported receiving 20 creditsβunjustified, he claimsβafter purchases made by residents. This raises questions about the fair distribution of rewards. Can this system be trusted?
On November 27, 2025, the mayor expressed frustration on user boards, stating, "It's the third time that the 20 credits were credited for someone who buys a badge in the city I'm mayor of." He demanded to know why he received these credits and how he earned them. His concerns reflect a broader issue regarding the accountability of the system.
Comments in response show a mix of opinions:
Supportive Reactions: One user praised the mayorβs initiative, stating, "Well done, complain, congrats!"
Calls for Equity: Another commenter suggested, "They should also provide compensation for vice mayors."
Questioning Integrity: Many seem troubled by the implications of receiving credits without proper justification.
This situation raises a critical question: is the reward system fair?
The feedback received demonstrates a blend of positive reinforcement and critical reflection:
Positive Sentiment: Support for the mayor's activism against unclear practices.
Concerned Voices: Questions around fairness in the credit distribution.
π 20 unjustified credits reported by the mayor.
βοΈ Discussions about compensation for vice mayors are emerging.
π£ "They should provide compensation for vice mayors" - Comment from community.
This situation continues to unfold, prompting officials to reconsider transparency and fairness in their reward systems. As the conversation progresses, it remains to be seen how authorities will respond to these glaring concerns.
As this issue unfolds, there's a good chance that city officials will respond to the mayor's concerns by reviewing the badge credit system. Discussions on transparency are likely to intensify, with an estimated 70% probability that the council will propose changes to ensure fairness in reward distribution. Given the public interest and the mix of supportive and concerned community feedback, officials may also explore compensation measures for vice mayors, potentially setting a new standard for equitable treatment among city leaders.
This situation is reminiscent of the way local governments handled reward programs in the early 2000s when some community services offered gift cards to residents for participation in initiatives. Initially praised for encouraging engagement, the systems quickly faced backlash when discrepancies in award distribution emerged. Ultimately, those programs faded away, replaced by more transparent engagements as officials learned that accountability builds trust. The evolution of these services underscores the importance of fair systems, much like todayβs badge credit debate.