Edited By
Markus Klein

Michael Saylor, co-founder of MicroStrategy, has expressed concern over the future of Bitcoin, stating that internal protocol changes pose a greater threat than the emerging risks from quantum computing.
In a recent statement, Saylor noted that protocol ossification could be Bitcoin's best defense against external threats. This comes as growing chatter around quantum computing's potential to compromise Bitcoinโs cryptographic strengths gains traction in the crypto community.
The response from the crypto community is mixed:
Some people expressed skepticism about Saylor's warnings. One commenter said, "Saylor suggests shooting himself in the foot. Moving around is dangerous so why not cripple yourself?"
Others noted the strange timing of these warnings, with one remarking, "at least weโre having a quantum season :/"
A prevailing sentiment among comments indicates a departure from traditional market indicators, as one user commented, "I'm becoming convinced the market isn't the same anymore."
As part of the industry's proactive approach, Coinbase has launched an independent advisory board focused on mitigating quantum risks. The board aims to provide research and guidance on post-quantum security, addressing community concerns over Bitcoinโs future stability as quantum threats loom.
"This board will help keep our systems safe in the age of quantum computing," Coinbase's spokesperson claimed.
Current discussions suggest significant changes might be needed in how Bitcoin operates. Enthusiasts worry whether an ossified system can adapt. Users foresee challenges in navigating both geopolitical risks and liquidity issues, particularly with USDT, which complicate traditional predictive models.
๐ฏ Saylor highlights internal protocol changes as a major threat to Bitcoin.
๐ฎ Coinbase's advisory board emphasizes a focus on quantum security.
๐ The community feels the market has fundamentally changed, complicating predictions.
As the debate continues, enthusiasts are left pondering: Will Bitcoin adapt to survive the quantum age?
Thereโs a strong chance that Bitcoin will see its protocol evolving significantly in the coming years. Experts estimate that if internal changes aren't managed well, the currency could face severe fragmentation, risking its dominance in the market by about 40%. Conversely, should the community and major players like Coinbase successfully implement robust quantum security measures, Bitcoin might emerge stronger, increasing its market relevance in the digital economy amidst quantum threats. Continuous discourse surrounding internal risks emphasizes that adaptation will be critical, yet uncertainty about market behavior complicates predictions. Enthusiasts are left with the challenge of understanding how geopolitical and economic factors play into Bitcoin's viability, with a notable probability that it will peak and then stabilize.
A parallel can be drawn to the transition from traditional banking to online banking in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Many incumbents viewed digital banking as a gamble, risking their established models for the chance of a more efficient service. Initially, they faced significant internal resistance, leading to fragmented services and pointing fingers about who would control this new frontier. However, those who embraced the change early onโlike Citibankโsoon solidified their market position, illustrating that calculated risk can pay off. This situation echoes todayโs discussion on Bitcoin, where timely adaptation to new technological advancements could mean the difference between market relevance and obsolescence.