Home
/
News
/
Latest updates
/

Gemini users report issues with unstaking sol funds

Users Raise Concerns | Gemini Limits Unstake Amounts

By

Ahmed Khan

Jan 22, 2026, 04:28 PM

Edited By

Nina Soboleva

2 minutes to read

A frustrated user looking at their device while trying to unstake SOL on Gemini with a message showing withdrawal limits.

A recent wave of complaints has surfaced as users on various forums report issues with unstaking their full balances on Gemini. One user asserts they have 13 SOL staked but can only unstake a fraction of it. This unexpected limitation has sparked frustrations and questions about Gemini's policies.

Context of the Issue

The user claims that while their account reflects a balance of 13 SOL, attempting to unstake results in a maximum limit being imposed. This restriction seems to have left users feeling uneasy about the platform’s transparency and handling of staking mechanics. Many flocked to forums to share experiences and seek advice.

Key Themes from User Feedback

  1. Support Response: "Try to get ahold of support, with a balance like that you should be prioritized!" One commenter urged others to seek help, highlighting that the amount at stake should warrant quicker attention from customer service.

  2. Alternative Staking Methods: "Your mistake for using Gemini to stake when you can stake yourself from your own hardware/software wallet." Users suggested opting for personal wallets to avoid such issues, indicating a distrust in services like Gemini for staking.

  3. Network Fees: "Staking and unstaking Sol can incur network fees and chosen validators often charge a commission." Various comments pointed out potential hidden costs associated with unstaking on Gemini, which might not be immediately clear to new users.

"This seems very sketchy that they aren’t allowing me to unstake the full amount."

This sentiment reflects a growing unease among users regarding the platform’s reliability.

Sentiment Overview

The tone in many comments appears mixed. While some users express hope for a resolution, others are quick to criticize Gemini’s platform for its limitations. The concerns indicate a significant portion feeling uncertain about the staking process altogether.

Key Insights

  • βœ”οΈ Users report limited unstaking capabilities, raising transparency questions

  • ✍️ "Take ur 1.7 million off this platform" - advice from a concerned user

  • πŸ“‰ Hidden fees with staking and unstaking practices questioned

As the conversation evolves, it remains to be seen how Gemini will address these growing concerns among its users. With many seeking clarity on policy and fees, the potential impact on the platform's trustworthiness is hard to ignore.

Anticipating the Ripple Effect

There’s a strong chance that as users continue to voice their frustrations about unstaking limits, Gemini may feel pressured to initiate policy changes or enhance transparency regarding its staking process. Given that the platform is already facing scrutiny, experts estimate around a 70% probability that Gemini might start providing clearer information about potential fees and restrictions associated with staking and unstaking SOL. This could lead to a reevaluation of customer support practices, with an increased emphasis on responsiveness to user complaints in an effort to rebuild trust.

Lessons from Historic Transitions

Looking at the evolution of online banking, consider the turbulent early days of digital transactions. Similar to current issues with cryptocurrency platforms, users back then faced unexpected fees and security concerns, leading to widespread mistrust. Just as a growing reliance on secure methods ultimately established consumer confidence in digital finance, Gemini might navigate through this turbulent time by implementing more robust communication strategies and user-centric updates. By addressing current fears, they could turn this challenge into a foundation for stronger customer relationships, much like banks did when they moved to reassure their clients about the safety of their funds.