Home
/
Blockchain technology
/
Latest innovations
/

Should de fi protocols launch their own l1 over established chains?

The DeFi Dilemma | Own L1 or Stay on Established Chains?

By

Liam Chen

Aug 29, 2026, 03:34 AM

Updated

Aug 30, 2026, 03:33 AM

2 minutes to read

A graphic representation of DeFi protocols considering the launch of Layer 1 networks, showing different chains and pathways.

A growing debate surrounds whether decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols should launch their own Layer 1 (L1) blockchains or stick with established chains. Recent comments from the community highlight concerns about the long-term viability and burdens of managing independent infrastructures.

The Pros and Cons of Creating an L1

While gaining control over transaction fees and governance seems appealing, the realities of launching and maintaining an L1 often bring significant challenges. Many experts agree that running an L1 comes with increased responsibility around validators, security, and liquidity management.

One commenter emphasizes, "Most are just buying themselves a bridge problem" when attempting to tackle these complexities. The sentiment echoes a broader concern: the potential for wasted resources on unproven L1s.

Is It Worth the Hassle?

Not everyone is convinced that creating an L1 is necessary. As one observer pointed out, "Never worth it" for most protocols looking to expand their reach. The broader sentiment suggests many DeFi projects may not need their own L1 to thrive. In fact, when existing chains offer sufficient user traction, pursuing an L1 can detract from growth and limit liquidity.

Timing and Economic Activity Matter

Experts contend that launching an L1 makes sense only when a protocol's economic activity justifies the commitment. If a project ranks among the top three in gas usage, it may be time to reconsider the decision to stay on an existing chain. Custom transaction fees and tailored solutions could be beneficial, but they require robust user engagement.

Key Insights from User Feedback

  • πŸ”Ή Increased Responsibility: Managing an L1 means more than just launching; it involves ongoing oversight and infrastructure commitment.

  • πŸ”Έ Market Realities: Many community members feel a significant number of protocols may rush into L1s without enough user traction.

  • ⭐ Caution Urged: "If you want more control, make sure you have enough traction to sustain your own ecosystem."

As the DeFi landscape reshuffles, it’s clear that launching a unique L1 isn't always the golden ticket. The conversation remains heated, with people weighing the risks against the potential rewardsβ€”raising the question: Will launching an L1 be a smart move or just another trend to fade away?