Edited By
Sofia Markov

A growing number of people are voicing their discontent with how long cross-chain swaps take, with waits stretching up to six hours in some cases. Many are questioning whether these delays are due to technical limitations or poor design.
Users have reporting frustrating experiences with cross-chain bridges. For example, after waiting six hours for a token bridge to process, one user tried another platform and completed their swap in just three minutes. Comments across user boards echo similar sentiments, reinforcing the claim that alternatives often deliver faster results.
Many users point out that the design of bridges requires them to wait for confirmations from both involved chains, which is significantly slower. One commenter explained, "Bridges have to wait for finality on both chains plus security confirmations. It's just slow by design."
Some respondents have shifted to centralized exchanges (CEX) or platforms like AliceBob for quicker transactions. One user stated, "I just use CEX for cross-chain now; it’s faster than waiting on bridges.” Another shared that swaps on AliceBob are "consistently under five minutes," highlighting the efficiency of alternatives.
The frustration among users extends to cases where their transactions fail after prolonged waiting. Reports of losing both time and gas fees add to the discontent. "Worst is when you wait eight hours and it fails—just time wasted for nothing," one user lamented, showcasing the growing impatience with slow bridges.
Most feedback reflects a negative sentiment toward the efficiency of cross-chain swaps, as many users call for a more streamlined process. Some commenters argue that faster transaction confirmation mechanisms are possible and question why they aren’t more widely implemented. A user noted, "Not true. It never needs to take six hours. If it’s intent-based, the relayer usually delivers very quickly."
△ Many users report that alternatives like AliceBob process swaps in under five minutes.
▽ Delays primarily stem from waiting for confirmations and security checks on both chains.
※ "I've missed price movements multiple times because of slow bridges." - Frustrated user
As frustrations continue to rise in 2026, many are left wondering if the future of cross-chain swaps will adapt to meet the demands of the people.
There’s a strong chance that the frustration with slow cross-chain swaps will push developers to optimize transaction mechanisms. Experts estimate that by 2027, about 50% of platforms could adopt faster confirmation systems, ensuring quicker processing times for users. This could lead to a significant shift, moving people away from centralized exchanges and prompting them to embrace decentralized options once they become more efficient. With growing competition among platforms, innovations may help bridge the gap, leading to overall improved user experiences and increased confidence in cross-chain capabilities.
The situation bears a striking resemblance to the early days of file sharing with Napster, where users faced long wait times and uncertain downloads. Just as those early adopters turned to more efficient methods of sharing music, today's crypto enthusiasts are following suit by flocking to faster, centralized solutions. The parallels highlight how technological growing pains often lead to innovation, ultimately shaping a more dependable system. As history shows, today's frustrations can pave the way for tomorrow's breakthroughs in cross-chain technology.