Edited By
Elena Ivanova

Users are expressing frustration as Bybit denies recovery of 5,999.9 USDT sent mistakenly via the Morph network. Despite confirmation of the transaction, the exchange claims Morph is unsupported, contradicting its own Asset Recovery Form.
One user, who sent USDT to an incorrect address, reported that Bybit support rejected their claim not once, but twice. They assert:
"Morph is not supported."
Yet, their claims are met with skepticism as the platform's documentation states that unsupported deposits can be recovered for a fee of $200.
The incident raises questions about Bybit's consistency in handling requests for recovery from EVM-compatible chains, as Morph operates on similar technology as Polygon and Arbitrum.
Comments on the situation highlight a broader concern. Several users shared similar experiences:
Documentation Confusion: One user pointed out similar issues in the past where Bybit's support also claimed inability to recover tokens sent to the wrong chain, only to find later that it was possible.
Support Evasion: Users urged others to include their UID and case ID for better support responses, showing a lack of personalized assistance from Bybit.
Policy Misalignment: A top comment noted, "This is policy masquerading as technical impossibility," echoing a sentiment that users feel misled.
β’ π€ Bybit's Asset Recovery Form states unsupported chains can be retrievedβbut support disagrees.
β’ π Many users have faced similar challenges, igniting calls for clearer communication from Bybit.
β’ π¬ "Has anyone successfully navigated this recovery process?"βA question on many minds.
As users band together, their collective voice may push Bybit to reevaluate its asset recovery policies. Individuals are left wondering how can exchange policies differ so starkly from written documentation, and what solutions exist moving forward.
There's a strong chance that Bybit may address the mounting pressure from users in the wake of this uproar. Experts estimate around a 70% likelihood of the exchange reassessing their asset recovery processes within the next few months. This could be motivated by a mix of reputational risk and the desire to retain frustrated users. As more voices join the conversation on forums, activating community feedback could lead to clearer, more transparent policies. Should those changes occur, users might see a more streamlined recovery process that aligns with published documentation, ultimately boosting trust in the platform.
The current situation echoes the retail fallout seen during the early 2000s when many companies struggled to meet customer service demands during a tech boom. Just like those retailers, Bybit faces the challenge of balancing rapid growth with customer expectations. If the support response doesnβt improve, it risks alienating its user base similar to how frustrated customers once turned away from brands that didnβt meet their service promises during a pivotal transformation. A renewed focus on customer experience could be the antidote to what grows into a wider disconnect between policy and practice.