Home
/
Digital wallets
/
Types of wallets
/

Why building on ethereum matters for donation platforms

Why Ethereum Dominates Donation Platforms | User Trust and Speed Priorities at Play

By

Hassan Al-Mansoori

Jan 25, 2026, 02:45 AM

Edited By

Daniel Kim

Updated

Jan 25, 2026, 09:20 PM

2 minutes to read

An Ethereum logo alongside a donation box symbol, representing donation platforms built on Ethereum.

A wave of discussion has hit online forums following a developing donation platform’s preference for Ethereum. Some crypto advocates are backing this choice as they argue that Ethereum excels in user trust, while critics highlight ongoing issues around transaction costs and efficiency.

Ethereum's Trust Factor

The platform underscores that Ethereum boasts more users, wallets, and a reputation for credibility than its competitors. Trust plays a pivotal role in donations, and the team fears choosing alternative blockchains could undermine that.

"But gas fees!" was quickly countered by platform representatives, who contend that for donations, speed might not hold the weight some presume. "A donation can wait 5 minutes. Nobody’s getting liquidated or losing an opportunity," they said. They added that selecting low gas fees can now drop costs to about three cents on Ethereum’s mainnet, improving upon conditions from only a year ago.

Diverse Reactions from the Community

Online discussions reveal a blend of support and skepticism:

  • Cost vs. Speed Debate: Some users assert that while the cost may have dropped, transaction delays can still be problematic in urgent scenarios.

  • Project Validity Concerns: Several contributions assert that this donation platform may represent a simple project that leans heavily on Ethereum’s brand for credibility. A user noted, "Seems just like a simple app imposing a 1% fee. Why choose Ethereum?"

  • Ethereum’s Future Viability: Opinions vary; some hold that Ethereum's first-mover advantage is fading. "Ethereum is unusable garbage compared to alternatives," claimed one commenter, pointing out potential issues with sustaining optimism about Ethereum's extension of dominance in the blockchain space.

Key Insights from the Discourse

  • ✦ Ethereum is noted for its extensive user trust, battling perceptions of higher fees.

  • ✦ Critics are vocal about transaction delays, deeming them impractical for urgent donations.

  • ✦ There’s a solid mix of support and frustration within the community regarding Ethereum's enduring relevance as other options arise.

It's evident that while the case for Ethereum in building donation platforms has some strong validity based on trust and established use, the dialogue about transaction efficiency and costs remains complex.

Looking Ahead: Ethereum’s Role in Donations

As discussions evolve, it's likely more donation platforms may consider Ethereum's established user base. Experts suggest as much as 60% of new projects might choose Ethereum for its familiarity amid ongoing reservations about speed and transaction costs. However, if other blockchain solutions can tackle trust issues effectively, a shift toward them could reshape donation platforms,

Historical Context: Lesson from Electric Cars

A historical lens reveals parallels with the electric vehicle market, which saw skepticism in its early days. Initially viewed as cumbersome, technological advancements gradually led to wider acceptance. Just as significant obstacles faced early electric cars, Ethereum donation platforms need to navigate engagement and efficiency concerns to enhance their appeal and bolster trust in blockchain donations.