Edited By
Elena Rossi

A wave of discontent is sweeping through forums as users express confusion over unchanging crypto rankings. Many report daily activity, yet their scores remain at zero, raising questions about how usage is tracked.
An active seeker seems to be facing an uphill battle. One user mentioned, "Iβve been downloading dapps and using them daily, but I see zero. My staked SKR shows 0-2 this week. Itβs frustrating!" This sentiment resonates with others who are questioning the reliability of their usage statistics.
Users shared their experiences, fueling a discussion about the platformβs tracking methods:
One user stated, "That's weird. After over a year of consistent use and staking, I got just shy of 10 $SKR."
Another mentioned joining at launch and acquiring significant amounts, exclaiming, "I bought it at launch, got 13k seeker! Not sure how you didnβt get that much."
These conflicting experiences highlight a potential issue in how user engagement translates into reported rewards.
Users are left wondering about the criteria for app usage success. Does it update overnight after daily use? Or are there hidden requirements?
"This confusion may discourage new users from trying out the platform entirely," remarked one participant.
This dissatisfaction could have significant implications for user retention and engagement. The delay in updates might deter daily users and hurt overall interest in the platforms.
Activity vs. Rewards: Users are frustrated that daily use doesn't reflect in their earnings.
A Mixed Bag: Responses vary, with some claim gratitude for rewards while others feel left out.
Inquiring Minds: Many are curious if thereβs a specific threshold that must be met to start seeing rewards.
Should the platform clarify its metrics and improve communication with users? This growing frustration may signal a need for change.
Thereβs a strong chance that as frustrations mount, the platform may eventually introduce clearer tracking metrics and communication with users. Experts estimate that if the current dissatisfaction continues, user engagement could drop by as much as 30% within the next quarter. Companies often respond in such scenarios by ramping up transparency and improving user experience, which could prevent attrition and boost confidence among daily users. However, the waiting time for any action could intensify the discontent, making immediate changes more likely as they aim to stabilize their user community.
Interestingly, this scenario bears resemblance to the early days of Ivy League admissions processes. Initially, the methods lacked clarity and frustrated many applicants, leading to questions about fairness and transparency. As universities faced backlash, they adapted and implemented clearer criteria and communication strategies to win back trust. So too might the app developers find that listening to their users and refining their tracking process could serve as a crucial step in restoring satisfaction and trust in their platform.